Hartono, Arianne vs Eala, Alexandra

Expert Analysis: Hartono, Arianne vs Eala, Alexandra

The upcoming match between Arianne Hartono and Alexandra Eala promises to be an intriguing contest. Both players bring unique strengths to the court, with Hartono known for her aggressive baseline play and Eala celebrated for her powerful groundstrokes. This matchup is expected to be competitive, with both athletes having the potential to dictate play. Given their playing styles, the match could extend to multiple sets, making it a thrilling encounter for tennis enthusiasts.

Hartono, Tie Under Tie Under 2.5 Total Total

Prediction Analysis

When considering the betting odds, several key insights emerge: Arianne

LLWWL

Eala, Alexandra

WLWLL

Date: 2025-09-02

Time: 20:45
(FT)

Venue: Guadalajara - Grandstand

Score: 0-2

Predictions:

Market	Prediction	Odd	Result
Over 1st Set Games	71.20%	(0-2) 2-6 1st Set 1.57		88.40%	(0-2)		56.30%	(0-2) 2-6 1st Set 1.53		72.80%	(0-2)		71.40%	(0-2)		61.30%	(0-2)		57.70%	(0-2)	Over 1st Set Games (66.00): This suggests that the first set might be closely contested, potentially going beyond the standard number of games. Both players have shown resilience in previous matches, which could lead to a longer initial set. Tie Break in 1st Set (No) at 89.60: The high probability against a tie break in the first set indicates that one player might secure an early advantage, leading to a decisive first set without needing a tie break. Under 1st Set Games (56.20): This contrasts with the over games prediction, highlighting uncertainty about the first set’s length. It suggests that while a longer set is possible, a swift conclusion cannot be ruled out. Tie Break in Match (No) at 73.30: The likelihood of avoiding a tie break throughout the match points towards decisive sets where one player manages to pull away and secure victories without needing tie breaks. Under 2.5 Sets (70.80): This indicates a strong chance that the match will conclude in straight sets, possibly due to one player’s dominance or effective strategies breaking through the opponent’s defense early on. Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) at 60.20: This suggests a fast-paced match where both players are expected to win their respective sets quickly, keeping the total number of games low. Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) at 53.40: This further supports the notion of a swift match, potentially with one player securing an early lead and maintaining it throughout. Countries Argentina M25 Mar Del Plata M25 Trelew Austria Challenger Tulln Generali Open M15 Mistelbach M15 Vienna M15 Wels M25 Ollersbach W75 Vienna Belgium M15 Huy W15 Wanfercee-Baulet W35 Knokke-Heist Brazil M15 Joinville M25 Sao Paulo W35 Cuiaba Bulgaria Challenger Sofia 2 Canada Canadian Open Canadian Open Qualification Canadian Open Qualification Canadian Open Qualification Canadian Open Qualification Canadian Open Qualification National Bank Open National Bank Open Qualification Chile M15 Santiago W15 Santiago China Challenger Shanghai Challenger Zhangjiagang Changsha M15 Maanshan M15 Wuning M15 Wuning W15 Luan Congo M25 Brazzaville Croatia Croatia Open Czech Republic Challenger Liberec Livesport Prague Open Denmark M25 Gentofte Dominican Republic W35 Uvero Alto, Punta Cana Egypt M15 Hurghada W15 Hurghada El Salvador M15 Santa Tecla Finland Challenger Tampere France Challenger Cassis M15 Cap d'Agde M25 Bagneres de Bigorre W15 Dinard Georgia W15 Telavi Germany Challenger Augsburg Challenger Hagen M15 Allershausen M25 Meerbusch M25 Metzingen M25 Ueberlingen M25 Wetzlar W15 Kaltenkirchen W35 Horb W75 Hechingen Great Britain W35 Roehampton Greece Challenger Hersonissos 4 W15 Heraklion W35 Heraklion Hong Kong M15 Hong Kong Hungary M15 Budapest Indonesia M15 Bali Italy Challenger Como Challenger Genoa M15 Bologna M15 Forli M15 Segrate M25 Bolzano M25 Lesa Palermo Palermo W15 Fiano Romano W35 Trieste W75 Cordenons Japan M25 Sapporo Kazakhstan Challenger Astana Korea Republic W15 Yeongwol Mexico Guadalajara Monterrey Open W15 Huamantla Morocco W35 Mohammedia Netherlands M15 Haren M25 Oldenzaal W15 Haren W50 Oldenzaal Poland M15 Krakow M15 Szczawno M25 Koszalin M25 Poznan W15 Krakow W50 Bytom Warsaw Portugal Challenger Porto Challenger Porto 2 M25 Idanha a Nova M25 Porto M25 Porto W100 Figueira da Foz W50 Leiria Republic of Ireland M15 Dublin W15 Dublin Romania M15 Arad M15 Bucharest M15 Buzau M25 Bacau M25 Pitesti W15 Campina W15 Cluj Napoca W35 Brasov W50 Bistrita W50 Slobozia Serbia M15 Kursumlijska Banja M15 Pirot W15 Kursumlijska Banja Slovenia M25 Maribor W15 Rogaska Slatina Spain Challenger Manacor Challenger Segovia Challenger Seville M15 Madrid M15 Xativa M25 Denia M25 Oviedo M25 Santander W100 Gran Canaria-Maspalomas W15 Denia W15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria W15 Logrono Sweden M15 Bastad M15 Bastad Switzerland Challenger Zug M25 Lausanne M25 Muttenz M25 Sion Montreux W35 Verbier Taiwan M25 Taipei Thailand M15 Nakhon Pathom M15 Nakhon Pathom M25 Nakhon Pathom W15 Nakhon Pathom W35 Nakhon Pathom Tunisia M15 Monastir W15 Monastir W35 Monastir Turkey Challenger Istanbul W15 Ankara W15 Kayseri USA Challenger Bloomfield Hills Challenger Lexington Cleveland Championships M25 Champaign, IL M25 Edwardsville, IL Mubadala Citi DC Open Mubadala Citi DC Open Mubadala Citi DC Open US Open Men's Singles US Open Women's Singles W100 Evansville W35 Florence Winston-Salem Open Quem Somos Privacidade e Cookies Jogo Responsável Entre em Contato Conosco Termos e Condições Editorial Política de Publicidade Trabalhe Conosco © 2025 melhores-apostas-futebol.com

Market

Prediction

Odd

Result

Over 1st Set Games

71.20%

(0-2) 2-6 1st Set 1.57

88.40%

(0-2)

56.30%

(0-2) 2-6 1st Set 1.53

72.80%

(0-2)

71.40%

(0-2)

61.30%

(0-2)

57.70%

(0-2)

Over 1st Set Games (66.00): This suggests that the first set might be closely contested, potentially going beyond the standard number of games. Both players have shown resilience in previous matches, which could lead to a longer initial set.
Tie Break in 1st Set (No) at 89.60: The high probability against a tie break in the first set indicates that one player might secure an early advantage, leading to a decisive first set without needing a tie break.
Under 1st Set Games (56.20): This contrasts with the over games prediction, highlighting uncertainty about the first set’s length. It suggests that while a longer set is possible, a swift conclusion cannot be ruled out.
Tie Break in Match (No) at 73.30: The likelihood of avoiding a tie break throughout the match points towards decisive sets where one player manages to pull away and secure victories without needing tie breaks.
Under 2.5 Sets (70.80): This indicates a strong chance that the match will conclude in straight sets, possibly due to one player’s dominance or effective strategies breaking through the opponent’s defense early on.
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) at 60.20: This suggests a fast-paced match where both players are expected to win their respective sets quickly, keeping the total number of games low.
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) at 53.40: This further supports the notion of a swift match, potentially with one player securing an early lead and maintaining it throughout.